Tue, 19 May 2026
Hunch

Some Bank of England members voted for a rate rise. Will the rest follow in July?

The Bank of England held its rate at 3.75% in June, but two of nine rate-setters voted for a rise. The next decision on 30 July brings a new forecast.

4 min read

What happened

The MPC voted 7–2 to hold Bank Rate at 3.75%, with two members preferring an immediate rise to 4% as energy prices stay elevated and unstable.

The vote came from the Monetary Policy Committee, the nine people who set the Bank’s interest rate. The two votes for a rise are the clearest sign yet that part of the committee thinks the energy price shock has not fully worked through. That shock pushed inflation to 3.3 per cent in March. It has since eased to 2.8 per cent.

World energy prices have fallen since the May meeting after events in the Middle East. They are still high and unstable compared with before the conflict. The Bank expects inflation could rise later this year as earlier energy price rises feed through.

The minutes also describe a job market that keeps getting weaker. That is the main reason most members want to wait.

The next decision comes on , with new forecasts. The Bank also publishes its quarterly Monetary Policy Report that day. Committees tend to move at forecast meetings. The meeting gives the members who want a rise their best chance to win more votes, and gives the majority its best cover to wait again with new numbers.

Sources: Bank of England (2)

The Pattern

Since 2011 we found four times when a minority pushed for a rise. In each, two or more committee members voted to raise the rate while most kept it the same. We checked whether the committee raised the rate within its next two meetings, which is what the first market asks about . The current vote is the case we are testing and is not counted. Sometimes the minority was early, and the committee followed. Sometimes it never won, and the next move was a cut.

2 of 4
In two of the last four episodes of sustained hawkish dissent on the MPC, the committee followed with a hike within two meetings; the window and the full record since 2011 are the same four episodes. In the other two the dissenters lost and the next move was a cut. The pattern is a genuine coin-flip — dissent tells you the argument exists, not who wins it. What separates the two groups is inflation direction: in 2018 and 2021 the committee's own forecast was pushing up when the dissent began, while in 2011 and 2014 it was already easing.
2021 Saunders and Ramsdenheld
: Saunders and Ramsden voted to raise Bank Rate in a 7–2 hold. One meeting later, in December, the committee hiked to 0.25% — the dissenters front-ran the entire tightening cycle.
2018 McCafferty, Saunders, Haldaneheld
: three members — McCafferty, Saunders and Haldane — voted for an immediate rise in a 6–3 hold. In August the MPC raised Bank Rate to 0.75%, unanimously. Dissent converted within two meetings.
Show the other 2 cases
2014 Weale and McCaffertynot held
August–: Weale and McCafferty voted for a hike at five consecutive meetings. No hike ever came. The next change in Bank Rate was a cut, in .
2011 Sentance, Weale, Dalenot held
Early 2011: up to three members — Sentance, Weale and Dale — voted for increases as CPI headed above 5%. The committee never followed; the next moves were more QE, and the next rate change was the 2016 cut.

The Read

History is split. In 2021 and 2018 the committee raised the rate within two meetings, and the members who wanted a rise were proved right. In 2014 and 2011 they kept voting for a rise for months, and the next change in the rate was a cut. What set the two pairs apart was the direction of inflation. In 2018 and 2021 the committee’s own forecast was rising when the minority began voting for a rise. In 2011 and 2014 it was already easing.

This time most signs point to no change on . Seven votes is a clear majority, and inflation at 2.8 per cent is close to target. The minutes describe a weakening job market, and a committee publishing new forecasts into a slowing economy has good reason to wait. The 2014 and 2011 cases show a minority can vote for a rise for months and never win.

The July report is what could change it. If it shows energy costs pushing the inflation forecast above 3 per cent into the autumn, the majority’s own numbers start to support a rise, as in 2021 and 2018.

Disclaimer

Hunch works only from sources that are publicly available, and publishes on the basis of analysis of that material. We do not form an editorial opinion or take sides, we give a simpler and wider view of news that already exists. If information in a source we used was inaccurate, distorted, or later disputed but had already entered our analysis, Hunch accepts no liability for that. Predictions are not advice. Phase 1 markets use Hunch Points, not money.

Published by Hunch under the Editorial Code. Complaints and corrections: /contact/.

Comment

Comments are moderated. Members post under their prediction record.