Tue, 19 May 2026
Hunch
US energy23 Sep 2026

Trump backs a US diesel export ban. Such threats usually worked within two months.

Donald Trump said on 22 September that he supports a ban on US diesel exports. His Treasury Secretary said a full or partial ban is being studied.

5 min read

What happened

Donald Trump said on that he supports a ban on US diesel exports, and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said officials were examining whether a full or partial ban would work.

US diesel cost $6.53 a gallon on , a record, and more than 75% above a year earlier. That day Donald Trump told reporters: “I’ve said let’s not send out the diesel. We make a lot of diesel … I’ve called for it within my people.” No order has been signed.

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said officials were “examining whether it’s feasible in terms of the overall refining capacity and whether a full or partial ban would work”.

This is the first time the president has backed the idea in public. His own team turned down an export ban more than once this year. In March the government said it was not considering an oil export ban. In May Interior Secretary Doug Burgum and Energy Secretary Chris Wright both said the White House was not considering one. On Burgum said an oil export ban was unlikely to lower prices.

Republicans in close races before the midterm elections are pushing for a ban. Senator Dan Sullivan of Alaska asked for a “temporary pause” of diesel exports.

The oil industry is against it. The refiners’ trade group, the American Fuel and Petrochemical Manufacturers, said a ban would “backfire”. The American Petroleum Institute said it “would wreak havoc at home and abroad”.

The US exports about 1.3 million barrels of diesel a day, nearly a quarter of what its refineries make. The UK and the Netherlands rely on it.

Sources: The Guardian, BBC, Financial Times, The Independent, Reuters, American Petroleum Institute, The Telegraph

The Pattern

We looked for times when a leader, or ministers speaking for him, publicly threatened a tough step against his own country’s industry to bring a price down at home. In each case no decision had yet been taken, he could act without parliament, and the industry openly opposed him. We counted a result if, within 69 days, the government acted or the industry gave way. We found eight cases since 1962. Only one, Mexico in 2021, is outside the United States, and two are the same president against the same drug makers.

7 of 8
In 7 of 8 cases a rule or the industry giving way followed within 61 days. The one miss, in 2022, was a warning that led nowhere.
2025 US, Trump and Pfizerheld
: Donald Trump wrote to 17 drug makers that the government would “deploy every tool in our arsenal” if they did not cut prices by . Pfizer agreed a price deal on . (The White House)
2022 US, Granholm and refinersnot held
: Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm wrote to refiners that the government might need “additional federal requirements”. Refiners objected in writing on . No rule and no pledge followed. (American Petroleum Institute)
Show the other 6 cases
2021 Mexico, López Obradorheld
: Mexico’s President Andrés Manuel López Obrador said there would be a maximum price for bottled gas. The energy regulator set price caps for six months on . (Diario Oficial de la Federación)
2020 US, Trump and drug makersheld
: Donald Trump signed a drug price order and held it back for a month so drug makers could offer a deal. No deal came, and he signed a new order on . (The White House (archive))
1973 US, Nixon and soyaheld
: President Richard Nixon said a new system of export controls on food was needed. On soybean and cottonseed exports were stopped; on the ban was replaced by export controls. (US Office of the Historian)
1966 US, Johnson and steelheld
: President Lyndon Johnson called Bethlehem Steel’s $5 a ton rise “unwarranted”, and agencies were told to buy only from firms that held prices. U.S. Steel raised by $2.75 instead, and others followed. (TIME)
1965 US, Johnson and aluminiumheld
: on President Lyndon Johnson’s order, his ministers said the government would sell 200,000 tons of stored aluminium. About four days later Alcoa and the other makers cancelled their price rise. (US Office of the Historian)
1962 US, Kennedy and steelheld
: President John F. Kennedy called the steel price rise “wholly unjustifiable” and named checks by the Justice Department. Bethlehem Steel and U.S. Steel withdrew the rise on . (The American Presidency Project)

The Read

History points to a result within weeks. In all six cases where the leader made the threat himself, the government acted or the industry gave way within 61 days, and four of the six came within two weeks. The one case with no result, in 2022, was a letter from an energy minister to refiners. It is also the closest in subject, since it was about fuel exports and the same industry. This time the president has spoken himself, Senator Dan Sullivan and other Republicans want a pause before the elections, and his Treasury Secretary says the idea is being studied.

The doubts start with his own team. Doug Burgum and Chris Wright rejected an export ban in public this year. Refiners also cannot withdraw a world diesel price the way steel makers withdrew their own price rise in 1962. The record is narrow too. Only Mexico in 2021 is outside the United States, and two cases are Donald Trump against drug makers.

If a step comes, history says it is likely to be partial and short. Of the three cases where the government acted, only Mexico’s gas price cap was the full step named in the threat. A signed order or a promise from refiners would settle the main question early. A new public rejection by Burgum or Wright would make a step less likely.

Disclaimer

Hunch works only from sources that are publicly available, and publishes on the basis of analysis of that material. We do not form an editorial opinion or take sides, we give a simpler and wider view of news that already exists. If information in a source we used was inaccurate, distorted, or later disputed but had already entered our analysis, Hunch accepts no liability for that. Predictions are not advice. Phase 1 markets use Hunch Points, not money.

Published by Hunch under the Editorial Code. Complaints and corrections: /contact/.

Comment

Comments are moderated. Members post under their prediction record.