Tue, 19 May 2026
Hunch
G717 Jun 2026

G7 wants no rare earth supplier over 60% by 2030. Half its recent big plans worked.

The G7 at Évian created a Critical Minerals Resilience and Production Alliance. By 2030 no outside supplier may top 60% of rare earths and magnets.

3 min read

What happened

G7 leaders at Évian established a Critical Minerals Resilience and Production Alliance and a crisis platform, targeting below-60% dependence on any single outside supplier for rare earths and magnets by 2030.

The 52nd G7 summit ran from 15 to in Évian-les-Bains and produced nine declarations, on subjects from Ukraine and the Middle East to AI. With Volodymyr Zelensky present, leaders promised more military support for Ukraine, including air defence and long-range weapons. France, the host, also brought India, Kenya, South Korea, Brazil and Egypt into the working sessions.

The one promise with a number is on minerals. The new alliance does not bind anyone. Members will work together on funding, on tracing where minerals come from, and on stockpiling and recycling. Beyond the 60% target for 2030, leaders set an ambition of 50% as soon as possible. Tracing starts with pilots on lithium and nickel and adds five new minerals each year.

The declaration never names China. But it follows Chinese limits on exports of permanent magnets, which disrupted carmakers and defence suppliers and showed how much the G7 depends on them. China processes roughly 90% of the world’s permanent magnets. The 60% limit therefore means replacing around a third of today’s supply share in under four years.

Sources: Élysée, Council of the EU

The Pattern

We looked at the last four big G7 economic pledges. Two delivered on time and two faded away. The two that worked had a named way to move money and a clear number. The two that failed were broad plans with little behind them.

2 of 4
Two of the last four headline G7 economic pledges delivered on schedule. The split is genuine and it tracks design: the ERA loans and the minerals action plan had mechanisms and owners; B3W and PGII had press releases and aggregates. The Évian alliance has a number but is explicitly non-binding, which puts it between the two camps.
2025 Kananaskis, minerals planheld
The Kananaskis summit adopted a Critical Minerals Action Plan. A year later it had survived a change of chair and escalated into the Évian alliance with a numeric target, a rare case of a G7 initiative gaining force over twelve months.
2024 Apulia, Ukraine loansheld
Apulia pledged $50bn in ERA loans to Ukraine funded by profits on frozen Russian assets. The mechanism was legally novel and delivery happened: disbursements began within months and continued through 2025.
Show the other 2 cases
2022 G7 infrastructure partnershipnot held
The Partnership for Global Infrastructure and Investment promised to mobilise $600bn by 2027. Tracked commitments run far behind the target, at roughly a tenth of the headline figure by most counts.
2021 Cornwall, Build Back Betternot held
Build Back Better World, the Cornwall summit’s infrastructure answer to Belt and Road, produced almost no capital and was quietly rebranded into PGII within a year.

The Read

History gave little reason to expect quick action. Summit plans usually go quiet over the European summer. The alliance does not bind anyone, and nothing in the Évian texts sets a July deadline. Even the pledges that worked took months to get going: the loans to Ukraine agreed in were first paid out in December. Five weeks, including a quiet August, is a short time for seven governments and their partners to agree on members and a work plan.

This alliance was better prepared than most. It grew out of a 2025 action plan that lasted a year and survived a change of G7 chair, and the lithium and nickel pilots are written into the declaration itself. Chinese limits on magnet exports keep costing G7 industry money. France also has a reason to show its year as chair produced working tools, and the partner countries it brought in give it early news to announce. The record itself is thin. One of the two successes, the 2025 minerals plan, counts as a success because it grew into this alliance, so only three earlier cases really test it.

Disclaimer

Hunch works only from sources that are publicly available, and publishes on the basis of analysis of that material. We do not form an editorial opinion or take sides, we give a simpler and wider view of news that already exists. If information in a source we used was inaccurate, distorted, or later disputed but had already entered our analysis, Hunch accepts no liability for that. Predictions are not advice. Phase 1 markets use Hunch Points, not money.

Published by Hunch under the Editorial Code. Complaints and corrections: /contact/.

Comment

Comments are moderated. Members post under their prediction record.