Tue, 19 May 2026
Hunch
UK energy19 Sep 2026

UK has yet to rule on Jackdaw gas field. Past rulings took weeks or many months.

The public consultation on the Jackdaw gas field closed on 10 August. The government has still not signed the decision letter.

4 min read

What happened

Michael Marra, elected leader of Scottish Labour on , said in one of his first acts that he would urge the prime minister to approve the Rosebank and Jackdaw oil and gas fields in the North Sea.

Jackdaw’s public consultation closed on , and the government has still not signed its decision. The project page for the field records a fourth round of public notice on the developer’s further information. It opened on and closed on . The page still says “Under Review”, and it was last updated on .

Rosebank is one week behind Jackdaw. Its own round opened on and closed on , and it is also still under review. Nothing more is being asked of the companies. What is missing is a signature.

On Michael Marra won the Scottish Labour leadership with nearly two thirds of the members’ votes. Within hours he told reporters: “It’s the biggest issue in my region in terms of people’s voting intention.” The same day Sky News reported the Liberal Democrat leader Ed Davey saying the Jackdaw field “makes sense” while it waits for the government’s decision.

These fields have waited before. Adura, the developer, answered the last request for information on , the fourth such request since 2021. The Cambo field’s consultation closed on , and it has been under review for 154 days with no request and no decision.

The next fixed date in the government’s own calendar is the Budget on , which John Healey confirmed on . That will be day 79 for Jackdaw since its consultation closed.

Sources: Guardian, GOV.UK (2, 3, 4), Sky News

The Pattern

Seven offshore oil and gas fields have a signed decision on record. For each, we counted the days from the end of public consultation to the signed decision letter, using the project pages on gov.uk. Jackdaw’s own earlier rounds are left out. Two came within 79 days, and the other five took 265 days or more. The same government department decided every case, and two letters, Murlach and Affleck, were signed on the same day.

2 of 7
Two of the last seven offshore field decisions were signed within 79 days of the consultation closing, Talbot in 14 days and Victory in 53. The other five took 265, 271, 273, 331 and 449 days.
2023 Victory, Shellheld
The further information consultation on Shell’s Victory field closed on . The decision letter went to the developer on , 53 days later. (GOV.UK)
2023 Talbotheld
The further information consultation on the Talbot field closed on . The decision letter went to the developer on , 14 days later, the fastest in the record. (GOV.UK)
Show the other 5 cases
2022 Teal Westnot held
The consultation on the Teal West development closed on . Two further requests for information followed, and the decision letter was signed on , 265 days later. (GOV.UK)
2022 Afflecknot held
The consultation on the Affleck re-development closed on . The decision letter was signed on , 331 days later, and agreed on the same day as Murlach. (GOV.UK)
2022 Captain, Ithacanot held
The consultation on Ithaca’s Captain enhanced oil recovery project closed on . The decision letter was signed on , 271 days later. (GOV.UK)
2022 Rosebank, first roundnot held
The first consultation on Rosebank closed on . The decision letter was signed on , 273 days later. That consent was later ruled unlawful and the field is back under review. (gov.uk)
2022 Murlach, BPnot held
The consultation on BP’s Murlach development closed on . Three requests for information followed and the decision letter was signed on , 449 days later, the slowest in the record. (GOV.UK)

The Read

History gives no clear answer for . Past decisions came either fast or very late. Two fields got a signed letter within 53 days, and the other five waited 265 days or more, with nothing in between. The Budget on falls in that gap, and so do November and December. Both fast cases were rounds on further information, like this one. Jackdaw reaches day 53 on .

What makes a decision more likely is the present. Nothing more is being asked of the developer. The last request went out in March and was answered in June, the consultation closed in August, and the page has said Under Review since then. The Guardian reports a growing expectation that ministers will approve Jackdaw within weeks. In two days the new leader of Scottish Labour and the leader of the Liberal Democrats have both said in public that it should be approved.

Two cases point the other way. Rosebank’s round of got a fresh request for information after 127 days instead of an answer, and Cambo has now been under review for 154 days. They are the reason the estimate stays well under half. A signed Jackdaw letter before the Budget would settle the question.

Disclaimer

Hunch works only from sources that are publicly available, and publishes on the basis of analysis of that material. We do not form an editorial opinion or take sides, we give a simpler and wider view of news that already exists. If information in a source we used was inaccurate, distorted, or later disputed but had already entered our analysis, Hunch accepts no liability for that. Predictions are not advice. Phase 1 markets use Hunch Points, not money.

Published by Hunch under the Editorial Code. Complaints and corrections: /contact/.

Comment

Comments are moderated. Members post under their prediction record.