Tue, 19 May 2026
Hunch

Scotland plans to merge its councils. Will a public consultation open this year?

The Scottish government has published a plan to replace Scotland's 32 councils with six to ten regional authorities and 120 to 160 community bodies.

5 min read

What happened

The Scottish government published proposals to replace Scotland’s 32 councils with between six and ten regional authorities, supported by 120 to 160 smaller community authorities.

The Scottish government published its paper on . Six to ten regional authorities would run education, economic development, strategic planning, transport and services such as waste. The 120 to 160 community authorities would handle planning applications, licensing and town centre work.

Councillors would still be elected in the wards that exist now and would sit on both levels, so no new layer of politicians is created. The islands would get their own arrangements. The paper does not say how any of it would be paid for.

No consultation has opened and no bill exists. Deputy First Minister Jenny Gilruth called the proposals a starting point for debate and said they do not show the government’s final views. The paper has gone to Holyrood committees and to Cosla, the body that speaks for councils, before a public consultation.

There is a clock on it. In his programme for government on , John Swinney set three months for talks on public service reform, timed to feed the next Scottish budget. Scotland’s council elections are due next May.

The current map of 32 councils was created by the UK government in 1996. It replaced nine regional and 53 district councils.

Sources: BBC (2), Scottish government

The Pattern

We looked for times when a UK government announced a plan to cut the number of councils before any consultation or bill carried it, and counted the days until a formal paper appeared. We found seven. England, Wales and Scotland were all announced in the Commons on , so those three count once. Two more come from the same Welsh reform programme. Five came before the Scottish Parliament, which now decides this. The closest cases come first. Two dates, and , are known only to the month, and we used the end of that month.

5 of 7
Five of the seven plans reached a formal paper within 101 days, and all seven reached one within 227 days. Nothing in the record moved within 31 days, and only three moved within 90. The split is by machinery, not by mood. The fast three had a document already written or a statutory route already open. The slow two, both Welsh, opened a period of talks with councils first, which is what the Scottish government has just done. Read the numbers with care: the class is small, and plans that produced a document are easier to find than plans that quietly died.
2024 England, UK governmentheld
The UK government’s English Devolution White Paper, , said two-tier councils would be replaced by unitary ones. The housing department wrote to every two-tier area inviting plans 51 days later. (GOV.UK, English Devolution White Paper)
2008 Northern Ireland Executiveheld
The Northern Ireland Executive agreed on to cut 26 councils to 11. The Local Government (Boundaries) Bill went through the Assembly and became law 71 days later, on . (legislation.gov.uk, Local Government (Boundaries) Act (NI) 2008)
Show the other 5 cases
2015 Wales, Andrewsnot held
Welsh minister Leighton Andrews published a map on cutting 22 councils to eight or nine, and called it a stage in discussion rather than a final decision. The draft bill followed 160 days later. (BBC News, 24 Nov 2015)
2014 Wales, Williams Commissionnot held
The Williams Commission reported on and the Welsh government backed fewer and larger councils. Its Reforming Local Government white paper, open for responses, came in , about 169 days on. (Senedd Research, new local government map for Wales)
1991 Scotland, Langheld
Scottish secretary Ian Lang told the Commons on that Scotland’s two-tier councils should become single-tier. The Scottish Office published its consultation paper in , inside 101 days. (Hansard, Local Government Review (Scotland), 21 Mar 1991)
1991 Wales, Huntheld
Welsh secretary David Hunt told the Commons on that Wales should move to unitary councils. The Welsh Office paper on the structure of local government in Wales followed in , inside 101 days. (Hansard, Local Government Review (Wales), 21 Mar 1991)
1991 England, Heseltineheld
Environment secretary Michael Heseltine told the Commons on that England would move to more unitary councils. He published the consultation paper on structure 33 days later, on . (Hansard, Local Government Review (England), 23 Apr 1991)

The Read

History says the plan will reach a formal paper. All seven plans here got one in the end, and five of the seven within 101 days. The speed depended on whether the government already had the paper in hand. England published its consultation 33 days after the 1991 announcement. Northern Ireland took 71 days in 2008, because the review behind it had run for six years. England in 2024 wrote to councils after 51 days, because the legal route was already open.

The two slow cases look most like this one. Leighton Andrews published a Welsh map in , called it a stage in discussion, and the draft bill took 160 days. The Welsh response to the Williams Commission took about 169 days to become a white paper. Both spent that time arguing with councils, which is what Cosla and the Holyrood committees have now been asked to do. The record is also small, and plans that were dropped are harder to find than plans that produced a paper.

A written statement naming a consultation date, or the paper appearing on the gov.scot consultation list, would make a December consultation more likely. Cosla refusing to take part would make it less likely. So would the government folding the question into the budget talks and calling those talks the consultation.

Disclaimer

Hunch works only from sources that are publicly available, and publishes on the basis of analysis of that material. We do not form an editorial opinion or take sides, we give a simpler and wider view of news that already exists. If information in a source we used was inaccurate, distorted, or later disputed but had already entered our analysis, Hunch accepts no liability for that. Predictions are not advice. Phase 1 markets use Hunch Points, not money.

Published by Hunch under the Editorial Code. Complaints and corrections: /contact/.

Comment

Comments are moderated. Members post under their prediction record.