Tue, 19 May 2026
Hunch
Spain football16 Jul 2026

Barcelona bid for Julián Álvarez, Atlético say no. Such stars usually stayed put.

Atlético Madrid rejected bids of over €100m from Real Madrid and Barcelona for Julián Álvarez. His release clause is €500m. Barcelona's offer stands.

4 min read

What happened

Barcelona refuse to give up on Julián Álvarez and could raise their bid to around €130m plus bonuses after the World Cup, despite Atlético Madrid’s refusal to sell and relations between the clubs at an all-time low.

Atlético Madrid have turned down Spain’s two biggest clubs. Real Madrid’s €150m (£129m) offer for their striker Julián Álvarez was rejected on . Atlético replied on X: “You make us laugh even more than Barcelona”.

Barcelona then made a firm offer of more than €100m. Club president Joan Laporta said it “remains on the table and the deal could still go through, but the offer is not open-ended”.

Atlético say they will “neither study nor consider” any offer. Álvarez is under contract until 2030 and has a €500m (£431m) release clause, the fee that, if paid in full, lets a player leave without his club’s agreement.

Arsenal and Paris Saint-Germain are also watching, but Álvarez and his family are reported to prefer staying in Spain. Laporta says Atlético’s refusal depends on a replacement: “Atlético said no because they didn’t have a replacement. If they get one, we will see”.

Álvarez is due to take a holiday after Argentina’s World Cup, then return to Atlético for pre-season training. That is when any private request to leave would come out.

Sources: Sky Sports (2), ESPN

The Pattern

Since 2013, clubs have publicly declared six star players not for sale during a transfer window while rich clubs chased them. We looked at how those standoffs ended. The newest come first.

2 of 6
Two of the last six players publicly declared not for sale mid-window joined the club chasing them before that window shut, and six is the full scored record since 2013. Both moves needed the release clause paid in full: PSG for Neymar in 2017, Barcelona for Griezmann in 2019. Suárez, De Gea, Coutinho and Mbappé all stayed. Six cases is the full record and at the floor Hunch requires to show History.
2021 Mbappé, PSGnot held
PSG rejected Real Madrid bids rising to €180m for Kylian Mbappé in late August, despite one year left on his contract. He stayed, eventually leaving for nothing in 2024.
2019 Griezmann, Atléticoheld
Atlético themselves lost Antoine Griezmann when Barcelona deposited his €120m release clause on . Atlético protested the fee was too low and filed complaints — but the clause settled it.
Show the other 4 cases
2017 Coutinho, Liverpoolnot held
Liverpool rejected three Barcelona bids for Philippe Coutinho, the last near €150m, and refused his transfer request. He stayed that summer, moving only in January.
2017 Neymar, Barcelonaheld
Barcelona insisted Neymar was not for sale. PSG simply paid the full €222m release clause and announced him on — the only mechanism that overrode the club’s refusal.
2015 De Gea, Manchester Unitednot held
Manchester United’s David de Gea had agreed to join Real Madrid, but the clubs’ standoff ran to deadline day and the paperwork failed at the deadline. He stayed and re-signed.
2013 Suárez, Liverpoolnot held
Liverpool refused Arsenal’s infamous £40,000,001 offer for Luis Suárez, the owner declared him not for sale at any price — and Suárez stayed the full season, moving only the following summer.

The Read

The case for a move is real. Barcelona’s offer is formal and still stands, and Laporta says Atlético’s refusal depends on finding a replacement. Álvarez, who Laporta says has wanted the move since his Manchester City days, goes back to a club that has just mocked his suitors in public. If he asks to leave in pre-season and Atlético find a striker, the refusal could soften quickly. Sky reports Barcelona are ready with €130m plus bonuses once the World Cup ends.

History points the other way. In six similar standoffs, no club was talked down from a public not-for-sale position in the same window. The only two players who moved went because the buyer paid the full release clause, and Álvarez’s clause is €500m, far more than any fee paid in these cases.

Atlético have attacked both bidders in public, which makes backing down before August costly for them, and Álvarez himself has not pushed to leave. That is why our market gives a Barcelona announcement within 17 days only 16 per cent. A request to leave from Álvarez, or Atlético signing another striker, would change that.

Disclaimer

Hunch works only from sources that are publicly available, and publishes on the basis of analysis of that material. We do not form an editorial opinion or take sides, we give a simpler and wider view of news that already exists. If information in a source we used was inaccurate, distorted, or later disputed but had already entered our analysis, Hunch accepts no liability for that. Predictions are not advice. Phase 1 markets use Hunch Points, not money.

Published by Hunch under the Editorial Code. Complaints and corrections: /contact/.

Comment

Comments are moderated. Members post under their prediction record.